Image Description

6th Rackspace Chess Tournament

Saturday, April 29, 2017

4-8 Not Rated

Round 5 Pairings

This section is paried using a Swiss system.

Board White Result Black
173 Ananya Bhat
BASIS-Med Center
Bruce Davis
Krueger
174 Zachary Rusch
Homeschool
Omar Carrillo
Bradley
175 Henry Cantu
St.george episcopal school
Logan Daley
Langley
176 Jaiden Davis
Langley
Lex Garcia
IDEA Carver CP
177 Logan Ragland
Langley
Kelin Moore
Ed White
178 Summer Barbe
Langley
Frankie Rodriguez
Rawlinson Middle School
U Prithvik Sriram
Bob Beard ES
0 Withdrawn.
U Jaycee Spivey
Alamo Hights JHS
0 Withdrawn.
U Ava Vargas
Alamo Hights JHS
0 Withdrawn.
U Evan Aguilar-Pine
St.george episcopal school
0 Withdrawn.

Standings

Rank Name Gr Team Rd1 Rd2 Rd3 Rd4 Rd5 Total TBMM TBS TBC TBO
1 Rusch, Zachary *
745 P5 (876)0
8 Homeschool W2
W
W5
B
W3
W
W4
B
W10
W
5.0 13.5 15.5 15.0 44.0
2 Bhat , Ananya *
UNR (715)0
6 BASIS-Med Center L1
B
W12
W
W5
W
W9
B
W4
W
4.0 12.5 13.5 10.0 32.5
3 Cantu, Henry *
UNR (725)0
7 St.george episcopal school W12
W
W10
B
L1
B
W11
W
W9
W
4.0 10.5 11.5 12.0 31.5
4 Davis, Bruce *
UNR (727)0
8 Krueger Bye W6
W
W7
B
L1
W
L2
B
3.0 11.5 14.0 7.0 40.0
5 Davis, Jaiden *
UNR (565)0
5 Langley W8
W
L1
W
L2
B
W6
B
D7
W
2.5 16.5 16.5 7.5 45.0
6 Rodriguez, Frankie *
UNR (580)0
7 Rawlinson Middle School D11
W
L4
B
W8
B
L5
W
W12
B
2.5 10.5 10.5 6.5 25.5
7 Garcia, Lex *
UNR (566)0
7 IDEA Carver CP W13
W
D11
B
L4
W
D10
W
D5
B
2.5 9.5 9.5 8.5 29.0
8 Moore, Kelin *
UNR (550)0
7 Ed White L5
B
D13
B
L6
W
W12
B
W11
B
2.5 8.0 8.0 5.0 21.0
9 Daley, Logan *
UNR (498)0
5 Langley L10
W
Bye W13
B
L2
W
L3
B
2.0 10.5 10.5 3.0 30.5
10 Carrillo, Omar *
UNR (599)0
8 Bradley W9
B
L3
W
D11
W
D7
B
L1
B
2.0 10.0 15.0 7.5 44.5
11 Ragland, Logan *
UNR (486)0
5 Langley D6
B
D7
W
D10
B
L3
B
L8
W
1.5 9.5 13.5 6.0 39.5
12 Barbe, Summer *
UNR (468)0
5 Langley L3
B
L2
B
Bye L8
W
L6
W
1.0 9.0 13.0 0.0 33.5
13 Spivey, Jaycee *
UNR (297)0
6 Alamo Hights JHS L7
B
D8
W
L9
W
0.5 4.5 7.0 1.0 16.5
14 Vargas, Ava *
UNR (0)0
6 Alamo Hights JHS ½ Bye 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
15 Sriram, Prithvik *
UNR (0)0
8 Bob Beard ES ½ Bye 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
16 Aguilar-Pine, Evan *
UNR (0)0
6 St.george episcopal school ½ Bye 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Team Standings

Top four scores for the team, minimum of two entrants.

Rank Team Points TBMM TBS TBC TBO
1 Langley 7.0 45.5 53.5 16.5 148.5
2 St.george episcopal school 4.5 10.5 11.5 12.0 31.5
3 Alamo Hights JHS 1.0 4.5 7.0 1.0 16.5

Terms & FAQ

Rank - The current rank of the player in this event.

Number (Number) Number - The numbers under a player's name are their pre-tournament rating, current estimated rating based on their permformance in this event, and their USCF ID number.

½ Bye - The player requested a bye for a round before the tournament and received half a point for the round.

Forced Bye - There was an uneven amount of players for the round and one player was given a bye with a full point awarded. The forced by is typically given to the player with the lowest score/rating that has not received a forced bye in the tournament. The USCF rules for which player gets the forced by are rather specific and do not allow for much judgement on the part of the tournament organizer.

TBMM - In the Modified Mean system, players who tie with even scores have the highest and lowest scoring opponents' scores excluded. Players who tie with plus scores have their lowest rated opponents' score dropped. Players who tie with minus scores have their highest rated opponents' score dropped.

TBS - Solkoff, the same as modified mean but no opponents' scores are dropped.

TBC - To calculate this, sum the running score for each round. For example, if a player has (in order) a win, loss, win, draw, and a loss; his round-by-round score will be 1, 1, 2, 2½, 2½. The sum of these numbers is 9. This system places more weight on games won in the early rounds and the least weight on games won in the final rounds.

TBS - This sums the cumulative scores of the player's opponents.

P2 - If a contestant has a "P2", "P4", "P6", etc beside their initial USCF rating it means that their rating is only based on that many games. USCF ratings become more accurate with more games played.