Image Description

6th Rackspace Chess Tournament

Saturday, April 29, 2017

K-5 Open

Round 5 Pairings

This section is paried using a Swiss system.

Board White Result Black
21 Tarun Bandaru
GHNO
Kevin Fong
OLPH
22 Pradhyumna Prakash
BrushyCreek ES
Donovan Smith
Coker
23 Ethan Mei
EEE
Joaquin Sinks
Langley
24 Taran Thota
Maggellan IS
Tarun Dhananjeyan
Indian Springs
25 Tanner Jackson
BASIS-Med Center
Edgar Bermea
Langley
26 Jaden Kroll
Founders Schertz
Tony Tian
Keystone
27 Austin Quitta
Langley
Helen Luo
Beard
28 Xander King
St.george episcopal school
Laasya Naga Pullabhotla
Rhodes
Bye Noah Villanueva
Langley
1 Forced bye, one point.
[Please see TD]

Standings

Rank Name Gr Team Rd1 Rd2 Rd3 Rd4 Rd5 Total TBMM TBS TBC TBO
1 Prakash, Pradhyumna *
1291 (1300)0
3 BrushyCreek ES W7
W
D2
W
D3
B
W14
B
W6
W
4.0 13.5 15.5 11.5 46.5
2 Fong, Kevin *
1220 P24 (1253)0
3 OLPH W13
W
D1
B
D5
W
W7
B
W10
B
4.0 12.5 14.5 11.5 34.5
3 Mei, Ethan *
1095 (1135)0
1 EEE D12
B
W13
W
D1
W
D8
B
W5
W
3.5 12.0 14.0 10.0 36.0
4 Jackson, Tanner *
1120 (1112)0
5 BASIS-Med Center L14
B
D11
W
W15
W
W17
B
W8
W
3.5 9.0 10.0 8.0 23.5
5 Sinks, Joaquin *
950 (1065)0
4 Langley D10
B
W16
W
D2
B
W6
W
L3
B
3.0 13.0 14.5 10.0 47.0
6 Smith, Donovan *
1112 (1096)0
5 Coker W17
W
W9
B
W14
W
L5
B
L1
B
3.0 11.5 12.5 12.0 39.0
7 Thota, Taran *
1066 P10 (1161)0
1 Maggellan IS L1
B
Bye W13
B
L2
W
W9
W
3.0 10.5 12.5 4.0 32.5
8 Bermea, Edgar *
1153 (1120)0
5 Langley D16
B
D10
W
W11
B
D3
W
L4
B
2.5 13.5 13.5 8.5 36.5
9 Dhananjeyan, Tarun *
870 (935)0
4 Indian Springs W11
W
L6
W
D10
B
W12
W
L7
B
2.5 13.5 13.5 8.5 34.0
10 Bandaru, Tarun *
1121 (1093)0
3 GHNO D5
W
D8
B
D9
W
W16
B
L2
W
2.5 13.5 13.5 8.0 44.0
11 Tian, Tony *
948 (950)0
5 Keystone L9
B
D4
B
L8
W
W15
W
W14
B
2.5 12.5 12.5 5.0 35.0
12 Villanueva, Noah *
817 (824)0
5 Langley D3
W
W17
B
L16
W
L9
B
Bye 2.5 7.5 8.5 5.0 24.0
13 Quitta, Austin *
1033 (1045)0
5 Langley L2
B
L3
B
L7
W
Bye W16
W
2.0 12.0 12.0 1.0 31.0
14 Kroll, Jaden *
914 (924)0
4 Founders Schertz W4
W
W15
B
L6
B
L1
W
L11
W
2.0 11.0 15.0 9.0 37.5
15 King, Xander *
703 (820)0
5 St.george episcopal school Bye L14
W
L4
B
L11
B
W17
W
2.0 9.0 9.0 1.0 22.0
16 Luo, Helen *
925 (904)0
5 Beard D8
W
L5
B
W12
B
L10
W
L13
B
1.5 9.5 12.5 5.5 32.5
17 Pullabhotla, Laasya Naga *
864 (828)0
4 Rhodes L6
B
L12
W
Bye L4
W
L15
B
1.0 7.5 11.0 0.0 26.0

Team Standings

Top four scores for the team, minimum of two entrants.

Rank Team Points TBMM TBS TBC TBO
1 Langley 10.0 46.0 48.5 24.5 138.5

Terms & FAQ

Rank - The current rank of the player in this event.

Number (Number) Number - The numbers under a player's name are their pre-tournament rating, current estimated rating based on their permformance in this event, and their USCF ID number.

½ Bye - The player requested a bye for a round before the tournament and received half a point for the round.

Forced Bye - There was an uneven amount of players for the round and one player was given a bye with a full point awarded. The forced by is typically given to the player with the lowest score/rating that has not received a forced bye in the tournament. The USCF rules for which player gets the forced by are rather specific and do not allow for much judgement on the part of the tournament organizer.

TBMM - In the Modified Mean system, players who tie with even scores have the highest and lowest scoring opponents' scores excluded. Players who tie with plus scores have their lowest rated opponents' score dropped. Players who tie with minus scores have their highest rated opponents' score dropped.

TBS - Solkoff, the same as modified mean but no opponents' scores are dropped.

TBC - To calculate this, sum the running score for each round. For example, if a player has (in order) a win, loss, win, draw, and a loss; his round-by-round score will be 1, 1, 2, 2½, 2½. The sum of these numbers is 9. This system places more weight on games won in the early rounds and the least weight on games won in the final rounds.

TBS - This sums the cumulative scores of the player's opponents.

P2 - If a contestant has a "P2", "P4", "P6", etc beside their initial USCF rating it means that their rating is only based on that many games. USCF ratings become more accurate with more games played.