Image Description

Specht Spring Tournament

Saturday, May 14, 2016

U400

Round 5 Pairings

This section is paried using a Swiss system.

Board White Result Black
12 Logan Hood
Blattman
Xavier Williams
Specht
13 Nicholas Franzese
GHNO
Isabella Gonzales
Langley
14 Emalee Cyphers
SVMS
Mason Schuster
Montessori
15 Ian Martin
SVMS
Vineetha Pagadala
Rhodes
16 Tessa Schroeder
Specht
Karina Yu
Austin IS
17 Paul Rodriguez
GHNO
Jared Mclaughlin
Specht
18 Leonardo Zurita
Anne Franke IA
Miles Austin
Specht
U Abigail Xin
GHNO
0 Withdrawn.
U Chesney Oines
Johnson Ranch
0 Withdrawn.

Standings

Rank Name Gr Team Rd1 Rd2 Rd3 Rd4 Rd5 Total TBMM TBS TBC TBO
1 Williams, Xavier *
UNR (660)0
2 Specht W8
W
W5
B
W6
W
W2
B
L3
B
4.0 13.5 15.5 14.0 47.5
2 Franzese, Nicholas *
299 P9 (522)0
3 GHNO W13
B
W7
W
W4
B
L1
W
W5
W
4.0 13.0 14.0 13.0 37.5
3 Hood, Logan *
UNR (536)0
1 Blattman L5
W
W8
B
W9
W
W10
B
W1
W
4.0 11.0 13.0 10.0 42.0
4 Cyphers, Emalee *
330 P5 (403)0
7 SVMS D11
B
W13
W
L2
W
W9
B
W8
W
3.5 10.0 11.0 9.5 30.0
5 Gonzales, Isabella *
304 P17 (431)0
1 Langley W3
B
L1
W
W13
B
W6
W
L2
B
3.0 14.5 15.5 10.0 46.5
6 Martin, Ian *
UNR (371)0
6 SVMS W12
B
W10
W
L1
B
L5
B
D11
W
2.5 13.0 13.0 9.5 40.0
7 Schroeder, Tessa *
368 (397)0
K Specht W9
W
L2
B
½ Bye W10
W
2.5 6.0 8.0 4.0 26.0
8 Schuster, Mason *
342 P19 (314)0
3 Montessori L1
B
L3
W
W14
B
W11
W
L4
B
2.0 10.5 14.5 5.0 42.5
9 Zurita, Leonardo *
UNR (243)0
2 Anne Franke IA L7
B
W12
W
L3
B
L4
W
W14
W
2.0 9.0 13.0 5.0 26.5
10 Yu, Karina *
338 P10 (295)0
K Austin IS W14
W
L6
B
W11
B
L3
W
L7
B
2.0 8.0 12.0 8.0 32.5
11 Pagadala, Vineetha *
180 P10 (156)0
K Rhodes D4
W
W14
B
L10
W
L8
B
D6
B
2.0 7.5 11.0 7.0 34.0
12 Rodriguez, Paul *
309 (207)0
K GHNO L6
W
L9
B
Bye L14
W
W13
W
2.0 6.5 6.5 1.0 16.5
13 Mclaughlin, Jared *
398 P4 (196)0
1 Specht L2
W
L4
B
L5
W
Bye L12
B
1.0 8.5 12.5 0.0 33.5
14 Austin, Miles *
UNR (100)0
2 Specht L10
B
L11
W
L8
W
W12
B
L9
B
1.0 8.0 10.0 2.0 26.0
15 Xin, Abigail *
375 P15 (0)0
2 GHNO U 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
16 Oines, Chesney *
UNR (0)0
4 Johnson Ranch U 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Team Standings

Top four scores for the team, minimum of two entrants.

This section is in a combined section for team standings. The team score is a combination of results from the U200 and U400 sections.

Rank Team Points TBMM TBS TBC TBO
1 SVMS 12.0 48.0 51.5 41.0 157.5
2 GHNO 12.0 42.5 48.5 31.0 138.0
3 Specht 8.5 36.0 46.0 20.0 133.0
4 Morningside 5.0 17.0 22.5 15.0 74.5

Terms & FAQ

Rank - The current rank of the player in this event.

Number (Number) Number - The numbers under a player's name are their pre-tournament rating, current estimated rating based on their permformance in this event, and their USCF ID number.

½ Bye - The player requested a bye for a round before the tournament and received half a point for the round.

Forced Bye - There was an uneven amount of players for the round and one player was given a bye with a full point awarded. The forced by is typically given to the player with the lowest score/rating that has not received a forced bye in the tournament. The USCF rules for which player gets the forced by are rather specific and do not allow for much judgement on the part of the tournament organizer.

TBMM - In the Modified Mean system, players who tie with even scores have the highest and lowest scoring opponents' scores excluded. Players who tie with plus scores have their lowest rated opponents' score dropped. Players who tie with minus scores have their highest rated opponents' score dropped.

TBS - Solkoff, the same as modified mean but no opponents' scores are dropped.

TBC - To calculate this, sum the running score for each round. For example, if a player has (in order) a win, loss, win, draw, and a loss; his round-by-round score will be 1, 1, 2, 2½, 2½. The sum of these numbers is 9. This system places more weight on games won in the early rounds and the least weight on games won in the final rounds.

TBS - This sums the cumulative scores of the player's opponents.

P2 - If a contestant has a "P2", "P4", "P6", etc beside their initial USCF rating it means that their rating is only based on that many games. USCF ratings become more accurate with more games played.